Over the last 20 years, there has been a staggering rise in the number of extreme weather events. According to a recent report by the United Nations, between 2000 and 2019, there have been 7,348 major natural disasters worldwide. Tragically, these have led to the deaths of 1.23 million people and resulted in an astounding $2.97 trillion in global economic losses.
 
With natural disasters becoming more frequent and hurricane season already in progress, it’s vital First Responders look at how they can utilize technology to best aid emergency response efforts. Boasting ubiquitous coverage, satellite technology has been used to support disaster relief efforts since the 1970s.
 

How First Responders can leverage satellite technology

Satellite imaging and analysis has and continues to develop, delivering crucial, accurate and real-time information to teams on the ground. As an example, California National Guard have been using satellite technology since 2018, to help them fight wildfires.
 
Satellites equipped with sensors are able to pick up hot spots via infrared radiation detection, effectively enabling them to see heat. This helps the state’s National Guard to detect and map fires, as well as assess the damage they cause. When a blaze is detected, a heads up is sent to one of two California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection-U.S. Forest Service regional operations centers in the state. From there, analysts use the information provided to “very rapidly determine whether or not the fires are campfires or car fires or a fire that could indeed become a very dangerous wildfire” – explains California Adjutant General Maj. Gen. David Baldwin.
 
However, aerial imaging is not the only way satellite technology can enable a more effective, safer, emergency response. Although terrestrial networks are built to be resilient, outages due to hurricanes, earthquakes, floods and other severe weather is common. With many natural disasters rendering terrestrial infrastructure inoperable, increasingly, redundant communications are becoming an integral part of disaster relief and management.
 
 

First Responder communications

For First Responders, the importance of communication can never be underestimated. Ultimately, response disciplines must connect and work together, to ensure the best outcomes during disaster recovery and maintaining public safety more generally.
 
However, it was reported by the government that first responders in the US rely on more than 10,000 separate, incompatible, and often proprietary radio networks to communicate with each other during emergencies. Given the significant consequences of not being able to properly disseminate information during an emergency, this is concerning.
 
 

Critical SATCOM for First Responders

Today, satellite communications (satcom) play an essential role in the global telecommunications system. Approximately 2,000 artificial satellites orbiting Earth relay signals carrying voice, video and data to and from, one or many locations worldwide. While many may be familiar with the benefits of push-to-talk devices and satellite phones, VSAT and BGAN terminals can also be particularly effective during disaster management.
 
Following the mass destruction of hurricanes Irma and Maria in 2017, 900 VSAT terminals were deployed at sites around the affected region and critical locations including San Juan Airport. VSAT terminals can enable:

  • Data and broadband connectivity
  • Voice communications
  • High throughput data
  • Drone video backhaul
  • Red Phone Emergency Responder Voice Network access



As such, they can prove invaluable during disaster relief. VSAT and BGAN terminals not only deliver rapidly deployable connectivity, enabling effective response coordination, they also deliver instant infrastructure. First Responders and recovery teams can communicate with each other and relevant control center(s), analyze the situation and make adjustments.
 
Connectivity also empowers teams to better support continuity throughout the recovery process. For example, enabling point of sale (POS) credit and debit card authorizations and inventory management, meaning individuals can purchase recovery essentials including food and fuel.
 
With over 20 years experience enabling critical safety across the globe, Ground Control has been a trusted name in Emergency Responder satcom since 2002.
 

VSAT and BGAN solutions for Emergency Responders

Toughsat Flyaway Mobile Hotspot

The Toughsat Flyaway is often used by emergency services that need a quick and portable VSAT antenna for both high-speed internet and VoIP phone services for on-site personnel.

The Toughsat Flyaway satellite system delivers Ground Control’s powerful Toughsat XP satellite solution, in an easily transportable set-up. The multi-functional stabilization brackets work for both ground mounting and roof-rack “fly-and-drive” mounting – even on rental vehicles. With an auto-pointing antenna, robust, high-speed internet and redundant communications can be quickly deployed at any location.

We’re proud to say our Toughsat solutions are trusted by hundreds of Urban Search and Rescue agencies, Federal Police, State, County and City Law Enforcement and Fire Departments throughout the United States today.

MCD-4800 “The Football”

Similarly, the MCD-4800 “Mobile Communications Device”, also known as “The Football”, is also capable of providing redundant communications and high-speed internet, anywhere in the world. The auto-pointing BGAN satellite terminal requires no user training to operate and can be used in extreme weather conditions.

Users simply place the weatherproof case on the ground or any surface with a clear view of the sky, turn it on and close the lid. Within a minute the MCD-4800 becomes a powerful WiFi hotspot accessible by any wireless device within a 100 meter range for up to 5 hours on internal battery power.

This auto-pointing solution uses the high performance Hughes 9450TW in-motion BGAN terminal integrated with our proprietary mobile electronics for a ruggedized, self-contained, user-friendly, global communications link.

Ground Control’s emergency communications satellite equipment meets or complies with all SAFECOM requirements, for emergency interoperable communication equipment.

Ultimately, satellite technology helps promote First Responder safety and efficiency, during disaster recovery. The technology has already been used worldwide to monitor events, improve responses and drive resilience post-disaster, providing infrastructure support.

If you’d like to get in touch to discuss potential satellite solutions for your organization or agency, simply email sales@groundcontrol.com.

Get in touch

With over 20 years experience facilitating emergency preparedness and response across the globe, we understand that in a crisis, every second counts. We’re constantly evolving and adapting our Public Safety offer and systems to best support teams on the ground. Which is just part of the reason Ground Control has been a trusted name in Emergency Responder satcom since 2002. Whatever your communication or connectivity needs, we can help.

The Utilities sector is in the midst of rapid change. Humans are consuming more energy than ever before, so much so, that the International Energy Agency expects global energy demand to increase by 37% by 2040. Utilities companies are increasing production and distribution capacity to fulfil consumer supply, while navigating a surge in demand for advanced technology, electric mobility and smart cities.

Concurrently, Utility providers are facing a number of challenges, including: ageing infrastructure, climate change and cybersecurity. All of which threaten supply and providers’ ability to cope with increased demand.

To better enable energy providers to respond to this changing, increasing demand, Ground Control surveyed 1,250 Utilities customers based in the UK and the US. We asked consumers direct questions about what they view as some of the largest risks to their energy supply and what would prompt them to change suppliers. Moreover, respondents were surveyed in groups, with some participating in early February, and others in early March. The impact of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine upon consumer outlook is significant, and something Utilities companies really should be aware of. We hope this insight will empower Utility providers to make decisions better aligned with consumer priorities and concerns.

The consumer view of the current Utilities landscape

In comparison to 10 years ago, do consumers feel there has been more service interruptions today?

Graph depicting percentage of UK and US utility customers who think the number of utility outages has increased when compared to ten years ago

Overall, survey results show that around a third of recipients (32.8%), feel they experience more service interruptions (outages) now, than they did 10 years ago. 28.8% reported fewer Utility service interruptions, and the majority (38.4%), responded to say they hadn’t noticed a difference. Interestingly, UK survey participants were more likely than their US counterparts to respond saying they felt the number of Utility service interruptions had increased, at 35.5% vs 30.2%.

When you consider the number of US power outages in comparison to those in Western Europe, the above is quite surprising. The US government has reported that the average American can expect to lose power 1.5 times each year, for an average of 240 minutes and in Western Europe this figure is just once per year, for a lower average of 58 minutes.

There was very little difference when comparing groups who were surveyed in February, to those surveyed in March. With just a slight increase from 32.8% to 34.3% of respondents reporting they felt there has been an increase in the number of Utility interruptions.

 

What do consumers view as a threat to their Utilities supply?

Graph illustrating how number of UK and US utility customers view risks to utility supply and how this has changed since Russia's invasion of Ukraine

As illustrated above, the majority of consumers (79.2%) surveyed in early February indicated that extreme weather damaging infrastructure was a threat to supply. And a very similar figure of 76.16%, was reported by those surveyed in March. Comparatively, hackers bringing down internal systems (as was done in the Colonial pipeline attack), was selected by 36.3% of those in February, and 46.9% in March. Given that almost half (46.7%) of March’s survey respondents stated they believed there was a slightly higher cybersecurity risk to Utility supply due to the war in Ukraine, and 20.3%, a substantially increased risk, this 10% increase is significant.

Similarly, the number of respondents indicating that they viewed political threats as a risk to the Utility supply chain almost doubled when comparing the February and March survey groups (23.9% vs 40.6%). Again, this is particularly noteworthy as 44.1% of respondents surveyed in March, stated they felt the political risk to Utility supply had slightly increased as a result of the war in Ukraine, and nearly one third (31.3%), that this risk had increased substantially.

 

Do consumers feel Utility providers are well prepared to manage current risks?

Illustration of average confidence level UK and US utility customers have in ability of Utility providers to mitigate outages

Consumers were asked to indicate on a scale from 0 – 100, how prepared they felt their Utility suppliers were able to manage previously mentioned risks. As can be seen in the above graph, those surveyed in early February responded with an average of 54.21. In contrast, consumers who were surveyed in early March, reported an average of 48.21.

This reduction in confidence is arguably due to consumers becoming more aware of the risks to supply, as a result of the war. Which is certainly understandable, given Europe’s dependence on Russian supplies of natural gas and ongoing sanctions of Russian oil.

 

What would prompt customers to change Utility suppliers?

Bar chart showing reasons which would prompt UK and US consumers to change utility supplier

As you might expect, nearly three quarters (72.5%) of survey recipients stated a better price would prompt them to change Utility supplier. However, in March’s survey group responses, this decreased to 60.7%, and greater confidence to limit outages rose from 38.3% to 45.8% comparatively. Which suggests that following the events of the war, customers have become marginally less price sensitive and place a higher priority on steady Utility supply.

Consumers reporting more renewable energy sources, a potential reason to change Utility suppliers, stayed relatively stable across both survey groups at 38.3% and 36.3%. Likewise, 27.8% and 27.2% of each group respectively, stated better customer reviews may prompt them to change energy providers.

Finally, just over a quarter of recipients for both the February (26.7%) and March (25.9%) groups reported better communication as a potential prompt to switch providers. The fact that this figure has remained steady implies that simply improving communications with customers may not be enough to restore the pre-war confidence consumers held with regards to Utility companies ability to manage risks to supply.

In summary, the survey highlights that consumers are relatively clued up on the challenges facing the Utilities industry and that the war has impacted concerns regarding Utility supply.

 

So, what can Utility providers do?

All Utility suppliers and energy network operators must strive to develop intelligent solutions and energy efficient operations, while ensuring secure infrastructure for the environment today and in the future. Ultimately, the key to success in Utilities is to collect accurate, real-time data from infrastructure and assets, at every point in the supply chain – from networks, plants, to treatment environments and customers. Many companies are already ramping up their development of IoT solutions in order to help them cope with the strain on energy demand. However there are connectivity linkages to each of the previously mentioned challenges of: ageing infrastructure, cybersecurity and climate change.

 

Why is connectivity so important in the Utilities sector?

Energy providers need to be able to determine the most efficient way to distribute Utility supply while also minimising waste, and distribution is what makes SCADA special. The orchestration of power, water and gas loads, all being reliably routed, monitored and controlled to deliver these resources. This is the centre of the critical infrastructure for every Utility company; and for this to take place, frequent, accurate, reliable data from all sites is required.

 

TSAT – Ubiquitous connectivity for energy providers

The TSAT satellite system is specifically designed to meet the demanding requirements of the SCADA and Utility industries. TSAT provides a private satellite network operating a direct communication channel between a process control centre and remote locations.

TSAT’s unique private satellite network solution features an industry leading mini VSAT hub that is specifically engineered to support mission critical applications (SCADA / Telemetry) in the energy and utility markets. The ruggedized and utility toughened-hardware is designed to provide years of reliable operation in remote locations and harsh environments.

Interest piqued?

To learn more about how SCADASat / TSAT can be used as a connectivity and security solution for the Utilities sector, download and read our eBook. Our advice covers the key issues facing utilities and renewables organisations today, and how the adoption and installation of secure satellite technology services can provide an effective line of defence in the event of a cyber threat while reducing costs, and improving operational efficiency.

 
Our expert team has delivered reliable, secure data transmission solutions to the Utilities sector for 20 years. If you’d like to get in touch, simply email hello@groundcontrol.com or phone us on +44 (0) 1452 751940

 

If you’re interested in learning more about TSAT and it’s role in unlocking ubiquitous connectivity, take at our related content: SCADASat | TSAT case study – Garth Wind Shetland Islands Scotland | Powering tomorrow: challenges and opportunities in Utilities

Get in touch

We've implemented satellite IoT infrastructure for decades, and there's very rarely been an obstruction issue we couldn't overcome with a bit of knowledge and ingenuity. We'd be happy to talk to you about your project and offer impartial advice on the best antenna and satellite service for your particular requirements. Call or email us, or complete the form.

It’s a challenging time to be a Utility provider. Where once there was predictability, there is now uncertainty.

Consider the climate: temperatures are rising, which places greater strain on the grid as people seek to cool their homes and premises down. Further, extreme weather events are increasing, impacting power lines and towers, and the communication networks that help Utility companies find and identify the issue.

There’s also the growing threat around cyber security. In fact, 44% of respondents to our recent survey of US homeowners said that they considered hackers to present a threat to their Utilities supply.

Related to this is the challenge of ageing infrastructure. With the retirement of 2G and 3G networks impacting telemetry and control, Utilities providers need to explore new means of securely collecting data for their SCADA systems.

Ultimately, all three challenges pivot around reliable and secure data collection.

 

Data is the key to operational success in Utilities

The key to operational success in Utilities is to collect accurate, real-time data from infrastructure and assets, at every point in the supply chain – from networks to plants, treatment environments to customers.

Armed with better data, utilities companies can more effectively model the impact of extreme weather events, and plan accordingly. They can measure wind speeds and water levels at wind farms and hydro-electric facilities in real-time, knowing when the conditions are right to increase renewable energy production. They can determine when remote facilities are working optimally, and when they are not, and in some instances, they can even resolve the problem through remote commands, without having to send an engineer onsite.

However, the number and severity of cyber threats to utility companies continues to grow exponentially as the world becomes increasingly connected. According to research firm Gartner, in 2020, there were 20.4 billion internet-connected devices, with approximately 37 percent of these being used outside consumer settings—including large numbers dedicated to infrastructure monitoring and control.

What cyber security threats are utility and renewable companies facing?

For Utilities and Renewables, the remote site environments and silo operation sites are a tempting prospect for cyber attacks. McKinsey reports that both geographic distance and organisational complexity make the utility industry vulnerable. Indeed, there’s potential threat impact across the whole value chain:

Utilities cyber attacks risk diagram

However, the cyber threats to electric-power and gas security are not too great to overcome. McKinsey advises that a structured approach that ‘applies communication, organisational and process frameworks along with technical improvements in a few areas, can significantly reduce cyber-related risks for utilities.’

The adoption of secure and reliable remote connectivity services can provide an effective barrier and line of defence in the event of a cyber threat or attack.

 
Our latest ebook explores the challenges facing Utilities companies, but quickly turns to the connectivity options available to mitigate the risks of cyber attacks and ageing infrastructure.

Ground Control works with utilities and renewable energy companies around the world, and together we have devised strategies that provide robust, reliable and secure data transmissions, balancing the value of the data with the cost of retrieval.

If you’d like to find out more about our work with Utilities companies, get in touch today.

When living and working in remote locations, there are limited options when it comes to internet connectivity and telecommunications. For individuals working for example, at sea, or on an oil rig, this operational challenge is likely something they are very familiar with. Thanks to advancements in technology however, there are two popular options for IP communications over satellite – VSAT and Inmarsat’s BGAN.

At Ground Control we enable individuals, businesses and organizations to operate efficiently and safely, no matter where they are based in the world. So for those not in the know, or new to facilitating operation connectivity in remote areas, we have broadly outlined how VSAT and BGAN work, and their relative strengths and weaknesses in the delivery of broadband internet.

What is VSAT?

VSAT – “Very Small Aperture Terminal” – is a satellite ground station that allows businesses and individuals to transmit and receive data, voice and video via satellites. The dish antenna will always be smaller than 3.8 meters in this classification and in most cases, around 1.0 meter. VSAT systems are comprised of four main elements:

    1. Antenna
    2. Modem
    3. Transmitter (BUC)
    4. Receiver (LNB)

Illustration of VSAT set up with appropriate labels

How does VSAT work?

The VSAT antenna dish is positioned in direct sight of the satellite. The antenna receives data from the satellite, which the receiver (LNB) collects. The receiver then converts the data into a lower frequency signal which can be transmitted over coax cable and interpreted by the modem and thus user device, for example, a laptop. Conversely, the transmitter (BUC) transforms data received via the user device and modem, back into a higher frequency (usually Ku and Ka Band), to ensure this can reach the satellite – 22,300 miles above the earth’s equator.

The antenna consists of small terminals which can be installed across distributed sites, and connected to a central hub via the satellite. With VSAT, data is either relayed from these terminals (also termed small remote ground stations) to other terminals (in mesh topology), or master ground station “hubs” (in star topology). In the case of the latter, the “hub” controls the entire operation of the network. For one end user to communicate with another, each transmission must first go to the hub station via the satellite link, the hub station then retransmits this via the satellite to the other end user’s VSAT. This tends to be implemented in situations where there is a Head office – Branch office type hierarchy, and is able to accommodate a large number of terminals.

VSAT Star topology

Animation showing basics of VSAT star topology set up

In contrast, with a mesh topology, all terminals can communicate with each other via the satellite without going through a central hub. This set up normally supports 5 – 30 terminals.

VSAT Mesh topology

Animation showing basics of VSAT mesh topology set up

What is BGAN?

BGAN – “Broadband Global Area Network” – is a satellite network which consists of four satellites owned by Inmarsat. The network can deliver high-speed voice and data connectivity via BGAN terminals, which are often both compact (size of a laptop) and portable.

Inmarsat licenses several manufacturers to develop BGAN terminals that communicate with the orbiting Inmarsat satellites. Ground Control offers all available BGAN terminals, including one we manufacture called the MCD-4800 – “The Football”.

How do BGAN terminals work?

The BGAN terminal is placed within a clear view of the sky, from there the terminal obtains its position using GPS. The terminal then needs a line-of-sight to one of the satellites within the network. This means there cannot be any tree, wall or building between the terminal and satellite. Usually units are set up outside, but they can be inside, if the satellite can be seen through a window. To achieve alignment, some terminals are turned slowly by hand, until they indicate that they have found the satellite – manual pointing. Or in the case of the MCD-4800, the unit automatically aligns with the satellite – auto-pointing. Finally, often just with the touch of a button, the terminal auto-negotiates with the satellite and connects.

Computers and other devices are then connected to the BGAN terminal, either through a simple ethernet cable, or via Wi-Fi.

VSAT vs BGAN

Broadly speaking, the differences between VSAT and BGAN can be grouped into the following categories: Coverage, Reliability, Cost and Security.

Coverage

The Inmarsat BGAN satellite constellation provides a seamless network that operates with near global coverage. VSAT coverage is similar, but in most cases it is not seamless as users will often require separate contracts on different satellites and teleports.

Additionally, if coverage is required while physically moving, it’s important to note the distinction between mobile and on-the-move connectivity. Some VSATs are considered mobile, insofar as they can be packed into, or attached on top of a vehicle to be set up in different locations. But VSATs with phased arrays or electronically steered antennas such as the Kymeta u8 GEO, can deliver on-the-move connectivity. Likewise, select BGAN terminals like the MCD-4800, support connectivity on-the-move via auto-tracking.

Furthermore, location, or more specifically likely weather in said location, can also be a very important coverage factor. VSAT satellite technology operates in a number of different frequencies, including C band (4 and 6 GHz), Ku band (12 and 14 GHz) and Ka band (20 and 31 GHz). Although Ka band enables users to send more information per second, this higher frequency is also the most impacted by weather conditions, for example heavy cloud, rain and snow. This phenomenon known as “rain fade”, also affects Ku band, albeit to a lesser extent. Conversely, the L band (1 to 2.7 GHz), used by BGAN terminals, can deliver a stable connection, even in adverse weather conditions.

Reliability

There are multiple satellites with coverage of most areas of the world, creating built-in options to reroute traffic for continual service even when there is a satellite failure. This makes both VSAT and BGAN very reliable, with availability rates of 99.5% and above. However, reliability during use is arguably dependent on two important factors:

  1. Number of concurrent users: The number of simultaneous users will impact the connection. Due to available bandwidth, generally BGAN is used for individual users or small teams with basic needs. Whereas VSAT is able to accommodate large operations, with dozens of users and a wider base of applications.
  2. Connection speed: BGAN is capable of achieving standard IP data speeds of up to 492 kbps and streaming speeds from 32bps to 650 kbps (BGAN HDR). However VSAT bandwidth can be selected from 64 Kbps to multiple Megabits per second. Meaning users can send and receive large quantities of data much faster with VSAT.


Cost

Initial cost – set up

BGAN terminals range from $1,295 to $13,495 for units with auto-pointing – simply, a device capable of aligning itself with an appropriate satellite. For BGAN terminals that provide on-the-move connectivity via auto-tracking, units are priced upwards of $13,495. As installation for BGAN terminals is relatively simple, often users are fine without assistance from a technician.

Similarly, VSAT costs vary significantly, depending on multiple factors including the bandwidth the equipment uses and size of hardware. Entry level setups start around 3,000 but can be $10,000+ for large scale operations. For these, organizations must also factor in costs for mounting solutions and installation. In contrast to satellite TV, in which antenna dishes only need to receive data, VSAT antenna dishes need to be placed within one tenth of a degree to ensure data can also be sent to the satellite in the sky. So a trained technician is required for installation.

VSAT systems with auto-pointing are priced from $20,000, but due to the automation, these units often don’t require trained manpower for installation.

Operating costs -Service plans

VSAT airtime plans usually have a fixed monthly rate, which is based on the bandwidth speed – ranging from $200 to $20,000/month. Some VSAT bandwidth plans enable users to pick their desired upload and download speeds, while more Enterprise Level VSAT networks have a monthly metered service – enabling network operators to build a higher quality network.

BGAN’s Standard IP service is charged per Megabyte (MB) of data received and/or transferred, which ranges from $3 to $7 per MB. Generally speaking, when moving large amounts of data, VSAT is a more cost-effective solution long term. However, new variations in BGAN pricing plans have allowed high data users to reduce the price per MB to near VSAT prices, at high volumes. We recommend speaking to a satellite professional who will be able to take your application needs and projected daily, monthly and annual usage into account, to help you identify the most cost-effective package.

Licenses

In addition to service plans, depending on the operation location(s), users may be required to obtain appropriate licensing. Africa, Latin America and Asia, all have stricter regulations regarding licensing – so authorisation may be required. Licensing varies from country to country for both BGAN and VSAT, however BGAN licensing is usually less expensive than VSAT. Organizations should analyse their case with an expert, so they know what to expect in the different countries they plan to operate within.

Security

VSAT and BGAN networks are standards based and support IP (Internet Protocol) and its variants through a protocol called IPoS (Internet Protocol over Satellite – TIA 1008). Both also support encryption of all data transmitted between two sites or multiple sites, which make the creation of Virtual Private Networks (VPN) possible. This capability enables users to achieve a far greater level of security.

In summary, there are clear advantages to both BGAN and VSAT technology. VSAT is best for permanent installations that need ample bandwidth, for example, delivering broadband to multiple users, at the same time, in off-grid areas. BGAN is better suited to single users or small teams with sporadic usage patterns, and mobile use, for example, vehicles on land and at sea. However, this article is for the purposes of broad understanding only. There are a lot of factors at play, and we advise anyone setting up a remote operation which requires connectivity, to get in touch with our experienced team.

Want to deliver reliable connectivity to your off-grid operations?

There are a lot of components to consider when deciding on the best solution for remote, reliable, connectivity. With over 20 years experience, our expert team is on hand to help guide you through this process. And as a preferred Iridium and Inmarsat partner we can also help you maintain connectivity, while reducing your daily, annual and ongoing costs.

Can We Help?

With 20 years of experience, we can help you make the best choices for your critical communication infrastructure.

We’re not invested in selling you a specific product or connections, just the best solution for your needs. Complete the form, email hello@groundcontrol.com, or call us: Europe, Asia, Africa and Oceania: +44 (0) 1452 751940 | North and South America: USA: 800 773 7168

    Required Field
    In this webinar, recorded live on 26th January 2022, four experts in the field of IoT / M2M connectivity discussed the challenges Utilities and Renewables companies face over the next decade, from ageing infrastructure to cyber security to climate change.

    Industrial IoT in the time of COVID-19

    First, Damian Lewis from Inmarsat revealed the findings from a recent research project into “Industrial IoT in the time of COVID-19“. In Electrical Utilities, Inmarsat discovered that IoT projects represented the highest proportion of overall IT budgets. When executed, IoT projects were delivering a 30% cost saving over a five year period.

    But connectivity was plaguing these projects. 75% of the electrical utilities companies surveyed encountered connectivity problems, and 59% of respondents stated that terrestrial networks like fibre and cellular are not entirely suitable for their needs. Despite this, only 32% are using satellite connectivity – far below the survey average of 47%.

    Unpredictability is the new normal

    Christian Strarup from Cobham Satcom looked at the challenges Utilities companies face, with more and longer outages due to extreme weather. There is also governmental pressure to fix the issue without raising costs for consumers. Christian’s slides include a list of considerations Utilities companies need to make in order to shore up their infrastructure, and ensure that they can continue to deliver services under increasingly unpredictable weather conditions.

    You can download Cobham Satcom’s eBook which goes into more detail on these topics here.

    Weathering the storm – case studies

    Liz Wilson from Ground Control looked at three examples from the Utilities and Renewables sectors, where companies have already started to respond to these challenges. In the first case study, we hear about a critical gas pipe which needs reliable sensor data in order to operate safely, and utilises satellite connectivity for reliability and security.

    The second case study sees renewable energy company RWE using real-time data on water levels and precipitation to know when to increase the amount of energy they can supply to the grid. Because their reservoirs are out of terrestrial connectivity range, they’re leveraging satellite in a clever and cost effective way to extract the data.

    Finally a community windfarm in the Shetland Islands who’ve anticipated that extreme weather *will* impact their infrastructure, and taken proactive steps to minimise the damage.

    PSTN end of life – case study and impacts

    Finally, Nigel Garnham from Atos looks at how British Utilities companies are responding to the switch off of the PSTN network, exploring a range of connectivity options. Ageing infrastructure impacts many Utilities companies worldwide, and the technologies that Nigel advocates you should investigate to future-proof your infrastructure are widely applicable.

    We hope you enjoy the webinar!

    Get in touch

    We understand the challenges facing Utilities and Renewables companies. Our team are experts in getting data from hard-to-reach places - so you don’t have to be.

    We are proud to have provided one of our utility customers, 27 years uninterrupted service, making satellite, that company’s most reliable system. To learn more about our solutions and how these can help you consistently provide better for your customers, get in touch today.

    In its most basic term, lone workers are defined as employees who perform an activity in isolation from other workers, without close or direct supervision. Working in numerous industries, there are an estimated 53 million lone workers across the globe, with almost half (25 million) operating within North America.

    In addition to safety concerns faced by lone workers simply as a result of being alone, many also work in remote areas. Communication plans and tracking can reduce the chance of accidents when lone working and ensure swift response times in the case of an emergency. While there are regulatory and contractual standards in place for lone workers, procedures surrounding lone worker safety are very much evolving.

    With rapidly changing needs and increasingly challenging environments, it’s imperative organisations continually evaluate their strategies, hardware and software to ensure they are able to maintain worker safety and operational efficiency.

    To better understand how lone workers in North America currently remain safe and connected when out of cellular range, Ground Control in partnership with TracPlus, surveyed almost 250 lone workers and individuals responsible for the safety and supervision of lone workers.
     

    Lone worker operations in North America today

    How often do lone workers travel out of mobile phone range?

    Graph illustrating how often lone workers within different industries travel out of mobile phone range
     
    Lone workers and lone worker supervisors were asked to indicate on a scale from 0 – 100, whether they ever travelled out of mobile phone range. As can be seen in the above graph, on average, lone workers sometimes travel out of mobile phone range. It’s also worth noting that lone workers actually responded with a lower than average figure than those responsible for them (52 vs 58).

    Our data also indicates that 10% of respondents are quite often out of mobile phone range, as these reported a figure of 75 or above.

    When analysing the data grouped by industry, recipients from the Mining, Forestry and Utilities sectors provided the highest average scores, and those within Transport & Cargo, the lowest. This indicates that those working within Mining, Forestry and Utilities, are more likely to travel out of mobile phone range than those in the Transport & Cargo sector.

     

    How many lone workers have experienced the following situations?

    Graph to illustrate how often lone workers experience various situations at work
     
    Results show over 60% of lone workers surveyed have been in a situation where they have needed to contact someone and were unable to, due to lack of mobile phone reception. Comparatively, for those within the Mining and Renewables industries, this figure rose to 88% and 73% respectively.

    Further, almost one fifth (19%) of those surveyed reported having an accident, and struggling to get help. Encouragingly, none of the lone workers from the Forestry sector indicated having an accident when lone working, but this increased to over 40% within the Oil and Gas industry. Subsequently, workers within Oil and Gas were also most likely to report having felt unsafe (54%); 10% above the overall average.
     

    How frequently do those responsible for lone workers check in with them?

    Graph to illustrate how often those responsible for lone workers check in with them, split by industry
     
    Overall 28% of respondents reported daily check-ins with their lone workers, 39% weekly and 45% as needed on a demand basis. Just 17% confirmed having a tracking system which allows lone workers to check in themselves, and over 10% disclosed checking in multiple times per day.

    Interestingly, those within the Forestry sector were most likely to report more frequent check-ins – 75% indicating as needed and 50% every day. Additionally, 50% of those within Forestry also confirmed having a tracking system whereby their workers could check themselves in. This is particularly significant, considering the overall average reported was just 17%. In contrast, none of the respondents within the Transport & Cargo nor Utilities industries, indicated having a tracking system lone workers could use. Given the operational efficiency benefits these types of systems can deliver, this is quite surprising.

     

    How robust are current lone worker communication strategies?

    Graph to illustrate which industries are best able to deal with comms and tracking when their lone workers are out of cell phone range
     
    As illustrated above, only 49% of respondents reported having the ability to both send and receive messages while lone workers were out of mobile phone range. This figure remained the same when recipients were asked whether they had a procedure which could always be followed (even if there had been an accident or equipment failure), that enabled messages to be sent and received without mobile phone reception. Interestingly for those within the Mining industry, despite 67% reporting the ability to send and receive messages while out of mobile range, just 33% confirmed the ability to do this under all circumstances, for example in the event of an accident or equipment failure.

    Additionally, less than one third (32%) of respondents overall confirmed they were able to track the location of a lone worker out of mobile phone range. This fell to just 8% in the Forestry industry.

    Finally, 8% of respondents overall and 15% of those within the Transport & Cargo and Forestry sectors, indicated that they were unable to support any of these communication scenarios.

    In summary, although our research represents just a snapshot of lone worker operations in North America, it does highlight that organisations still have some way to go in terms of safeguarding lone workers; a sentiment which holds true across all surveyed industries.

    The future of lone worker safety: The RockSTAR

    Communication plans and tracking are imperative to lone worker safety and increasing operational efficiency. With this in mind, it would be remiss of us to not talk about the RockSTAR device by Rock Seven (now trading as Ground Control). This powerful, handheld device allows the user to send and receive short messages from anywhere on Earth with a clear view of the sky. The unit is waterproof, ruggedized, and built to withstand the most challenging environments. And perhaps most importantly, the RockSTAR is able to transmit every minute with 15-second updates, ensuring teams know the whereabouts and safety of their lone workers at all times.

    What is TracPlus?

    TracPlus is a trusted real-time tracking and communication platform of first responders, government agencies, militaries, and other critical operators around the world. It has been developed to deliver situational awareness to first responders, irrespective of who owns the asset, what the asset is, who provides the tracking, or what the platform or signal type is – be it radio, cellular or satellite.

    Get in touch

    Ground Control and TracPlus have worked in partnership for over eight years, developing essential, cost-effective solutions for organisations and their remote field workers all over the world.

    If you’d like to get in touch with our expert team, simply complete our online form, or you can email sales@groundcontrol.com or phone us on +1.805.783.4600 (USA) or +44 (0) 1452 751940 (UK).

    For Oil and Gas companies, selecting the right satellite connectivity to connect people or machines can be complex. We’ve built a simple decision tree to help you determine the best satellite solutions to connect people or machines, whether your throughput requirements are low or high, fixed or mobile.

    *Mobile can also be fixed

    These products are of course not your only options for these requirements, but they are our top picks, and here’s why.

    Iridium Extreme 9575 PTT

    The Extreme 9575 PTT is Iridium’s top-of-the-line push-to-talk satellite phone. It offers superior PTT, voice, SMS texting, GPS, low-speed Internet, SOS button, and real-time web-tracking. This ruggedized satellite phone works in all weather conditions and is an ideal communications tool for remote Oil and Gas sites, and for total connectivity wherever engineers travel.

    Toughsat XP

    Toughsat XP is Ground Control’s flagship professional series mobile satellite system, incorporating a powerful feature set that operates both normal and extreme remote site environments. The quick one-button deployment provides high-speed WiFi for up to 256 devices from any well site in less than 3.5 minutes.

    MCD-4800

    The MCD-4800 (“The Football”) is an auto-pointing BGAN satellite terminal that requires no user training to operate. Simply place the weatherproof case anywhere on site, turn it on and then close the lid – no pointing necessary. Within a minute the MCD-4800 becomes a powerful WiFi hotspot accessible by any wireless device within a 100-meter range for up to 5 hours on internal battery power.

    RockBLOCK 9602

    Perfect for M2M / IoT low throughput well site requirements, the RockBLOCK 9602 satellite modem utilizes the power of the Iridium® Satellite Network. The versatile and reliable RockBLOCK delivers plug-and-play satellite connectivity, from any point on Earth including the polar regions.

    Hughes 9502

    The 9502 terminal delivers affordable, global, end-to-end IP data connectivity and is an ideal choice for Oil and Gas companies. The exceptional low power consumption (1W idle) of the Hughes 9502 makes it possible to provide end-to-end IP connectivity to sites that are off-grid. This breakthrough provides end-to-end IP connectivity to any power-challenged Oil and Gas locations that involve sensitive power budgets.

    RockREMOTE

    RockREMOTE delivers a reliable and flexible, all IP-based, dual-mode LTE-Satellite communications solution for fixed, semi-fixed or mobile M2M / IoT applications worldwide. Customers select between Ethernet, Wi-Fi or Serial RS232/485 for their communications interface requirements. The solution combines the RockREMOTE terminal, the Iridium Certus network and LTE cellular connectivity, end-to-end networking and the powerful Cloudloop platform. It can be tailored to address a variety of fixed and mobile communications challenges faced by Oil and Gas engineers.

    SCADASat

    The SCADASat by TSAT satellite system is designed to meet the demanding requirements of the Oil & Gas industry. SCADASat provides a private satellite network operating a direct communication channel between a process control centre and these often remote locations. By locating a private TSAT3000 HUB at a control centre, complete independence of any public infrastructure is obtained, and secure and reliable communication between Oil and Gas sites is assured.

    Can We Help You?

    With 20 years of experience, we can help you make the best choices for your remote connectivity, whether you need one or several thousand devices!

    We’re not invested in selling you a specific product or connections, just the best solution for your needs.

    Call us on +44 (0) 1452 751940 (Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania) or 800 773 7168 (North and South America), complete the form, or email hello@groundcontrol.com.

      Required Field

      Nobody questions the value of data extracted from oil well sites. From exploration to flowback testing, and drilling to recovery, there is both routine and failure data to be captured, stored, shared and analyzed.

      In many cases, this data is out of reach of terrestrial communication networks, giving production companies two choices: send someone to retrieve the data, or set up a satellite communications network.

      In this blog post we’re comparing the pros and cons of both options. Full disclosure: we believe satellite connectivity is the more scalable, cost-effective and safe approach, but we’ll be as objective as a satellite communications company can be!

      Field Engineer vs. BGAN machine

      Field Engineer vs BGAN machine infographic

      Here’s a full breakdown of the relative costs of operation

      An experienced Field Engineer costs on average $68,132 per year. Plus expenses and other benefits including company vehicles and overtime charge out rates.

      The cost of operating a BGAN satellite connectivity terminal can be as little as $63 per month for up to 20MB – a saving of $68,069 annually and $680,690 over the typical 10 years lifetime of a BGAN terminal.

      Gas is an ever-increasing expense and the cost of fuel has increased around the world. The average Field Engineer will travel on average 25,000 miles per year. With the average gas price currently $3.34, this amounts to almost $3,500 in fuel costs alone; with insurance and taxable miles on top, and of course chargeable time.

      Time is money. Onsite maintenance of traditional connectivity devices can take several hours to service – with on-site visits taking place on average once per week. Even then, there is no guarantee of the issues being resolved without further callbacks. Installation of a BGAN device mitigates the need for on-site Engineers. With a reliable uptime of 99.9%, BGAN requires minimal servicing, maintenance or ongoing equipment checks.

      A single weekly call-out based on the average Field Engineer’s salary is a day rate of $272.52. With expenses, it is likely to be around $500, each time the system fails and on the basis that the fault can be rectified the same day. BGAN is highly reliable – even when installed in the most remote locations. Installation of one BGAN satellite connectivity device across the oil well network of ten pumps could save tens of thousands of dollars each year.

      Servicing, ongoing maintenance and fault checking is costly work. In addition, equipment required to measure and transmit data from oil well sites often costs hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars per month. Installation of a BGAN satellite connectivity device mitigates these costs completely. Reporting on exception, the costs to transmit and measure data are as little as $2 a day.

      BGAN satellite connectivity devices are incredibly cost-efficient. The typical hardware and airtime requirements for a remote oil site are just $2 a day, or $756 per year. Compared with the average cost of a Field Engineer, the savings to your business are in excess of $67,376 every, single, year.

      Want to know how you can reduce your call out costs?

      We’re a preferred Iridium and Inmarsat partner and can help you to reduce your daily, annual and ongoing connectivity costs. It’s what we do best and we’re always here to help. Email us on hello@groundcontrol.com or call:

      UK and RoW +44 (0) 1452 751940

      USA +1.805.783.4600

      What do we mean by portable? Portable and mobile are often used interchangeably in the satellite internet broadband context, and the water gets muddied even further when you bring satellite phones into the equation. For Ground Control, we define these three groups of products as follows:

      • Portable: can be carried and deployed by a single person; delivers satellite broadband. Most terminals are capable of voice calls, too.
      • Mobile: the device does not need to be pointed and can be used while in-motion – fixed to a car, truck or train, for example, or for rapid fixed deployment (while maritime and aviation applications can also be described as mobile, they have their own categories).
      • Handheld: satellite phones. These are chiefly designed for voice rather than data, although some will deliver a small amount of data for tracking or short text messages.

       
      Now that’s cleared up, let’s look at the best devices for your portable satellite internet needs. The key comparison points you should be looking at are:

      Broadband speeds

      While these portable devices cannot boast the sorts of speeds you can expect from a fibre broadband connection, they are typically used when there are no other terrestrial connections available. There’s a wide range of upload and download speeds available. If you’re not sure what speeds you’ll need, here’s a quick guide:

      Devices

      Broadband Speed

      Good For

      MCD-4800
      Explorer 510
      Hughes 9202M
      Up to 464 Kbps download
      448 Kbps upload shared
      Phone services | Email | Instant messaging | Internet browsing | Live video broadcasting | Large file transfers | Video conferencing
      Explorer 710
      Hughes 9211
      650 Kbps download streaming
      650 Kbps upload streaming
      Faster file transfers | Video streaming connectivity | Class 1 terminals
      MCD-MissionLINK Up to 700 Kbps download
      352 Kbps upload
      Faster file transfers | Multiple Iridium voice channels available
      Toughsat Flyaway 20 Mbps download
      7 Mbps upload
      Live event broadcasting | Video streaming (Netflix and Youtube work well at this speed) | Multiple users | Speeds depend on size of individual networks and transmitter power

       

      Battery life

      Self-explanatory, really; for how long will your device keep providing you with a WiFi hotspot before it needs recharging? All of the times listed below assume that the device is in active use; they have substantially longer standby times.

      Devices

      Battery Life

      Explorer 510
      Explorer 710
      3.5 hours
      Hughes 9211 4 hours
      MCD-4800 5 hours
      Hughes 9202M 5.5 hours
      MCD-MissionLINK 6 hours
      Toughsat Flyaway Mains powered

       

      Ingress Protection (IP) rating

      If you’re going to be using your device outside, it’ll need some degree of ingress protection, and all of these devices are pretty robust. The Toughsat Flyaway is designed to be used outside in extreme environments, but the satellite router is designed for use indoors or in a protective IP rated enclosure.

      Devices

      IP Rating

      Definition

      Hughes 9202M
      Hughes 9211
      IP55 Not completely protected from dust ingress but will still function; will function if a water jet is pointed at it
      Explorer 510
      Explorer 710
      MCD-MissionLINK
      IP66 Completely protected from dust ingress; will function if a powerful water jet is pointed at it
      MCD-4800 IP67 Completely protected from dust ingress; can be immersed in water up to 1m for up to 30 minutes

       

      Satellite connectivity

      If you’re not familiar with how satellite orbits affect communication, it’s worth reading our blog post on the topic. The short version is that if you choose a geostationary orbit (GEO), you need to remember that the device usually needs to be pointed at the satellite (after which you’ll have a very robust connection), and that the device won’t work in the polar regions. A device connecting with satellites in low earth orbit (LEO) will work anywhere in the world, and doesn’t require pointing.

      Devices

      Satellite Airtime Provider

      GEO or LEO

      MCD-4800*
      Explorer 510
      Explorer 710
      Hughes 9202M
      Hughes 9211
      Inmarsat Geostationary
      MCD-MissionLINK Iridium Low Earth Orbit
      Toughsat Flyaway* Ku Band VSAT Networks Geostationary

      *These devices auto-point to the satellite

       

      Price range

      Remember that you’ll need to pay both for the device and for the airtime, so these estimates are a guide only.

      Devices

      Price Range

      Explorer 510 <$2,500
      Hughes 9202M $2,500 – $4,000
      Hughes 9211
      Explorer 710
      $4,000 – $6,000
      MCD-MissionLINK
      MCD-4800
      $12,000 – $14,000
      Toughsat Flyaway $16,000 – $20,000

       

      So, it’s not a very satisfying answer, but with such a wide range of options and functionality, the best portable satellite device is the one that best meets your needs. If you need any help, that’s what we’re here for, so please get in touch.

      Can We Help You?

      With 20 years of experience, we can help you make the best choices for your remote renewables connectivity infrastructure.

      We’re not invested in selling you a specific product or connections, just the best solution for your needs.

      Call us on +44 (0) 1452 751940 (Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania) or 800 773 7168 (North and South America), complete the form, or email hello@groundcontrol.com.

        Required Field